Laser MTS
Running a laser business

Nesting for laser cutting: how to fit more parts on every sheet

· 11 min read

A 600 × 400 mm (about 24 × 16″) sheet of plywood holds four rows of three bat cutouts — 12 parts. Same sheet, same spacing, but rotate the bats and tuck their wings together, and you get 19. That’s nesting: arranging parts so as little of the sheet as possible ends up in the scrap bin. Here’s everything that affects the result, with numbers from a real sheet.

Two 600 × 400 mm plywood sheets of bat cutouts: on the left 12 parts in neat rows at 25 percent sheet utilization, on the right 19 parts rotated and tucked wing into wing at 40 percent
A 150 mm (5.9″) bat, 3 mm (1/8″) spacing, 5 mm (3/16″) edge margin. On the right, a real Laser MTS nesting result. Sheet utilization is the area of the cut parts divided by the area of the sheet.

In short

  • Nesting means arranging parts on a sheet to fit as many as possible while keeping part spacing and an edge margin.
  • In the bat example the same sheet holds 19 parts instead of 12 — 37% fewer sheets for the same order.
  • The gain depends on the shape: irregular parts (wings, points, tabs) gain a lot; circles and hearts in rows gain almost nothing.
  • Limit rotation when grain direction matters, and never mirror parts that carry engraving.
  • Common-line cutting shortens the cut (by 30% in the example), but you have to remove duplicate lines and plan the cut order.

What nesting is

Nesting is how you lay out parts on a sheet before cutting. The goal: fit as many parts as possible without breaking the rules of cutting — spacing between parts, a margin from the edge, and grain direction when it matters. Sheet goods cost money, and whatever is left between the parts usually goes in the bin.

The number to watch is sheet utilization, also called material yield — the area of the cut parts divided by the area of the sheet. You’ll never reach 100% with anything but rectangles: the bat on its own fills only 44% of its bounding box. So 40% is a good result for this shape — and going from 25% to 40% means more than a third fewer sheets for the same order.

Manual vs automatic nesting

Rows take a minute in your laser software: copy the part into a grid (Grid Array in LightBurn). For rectangles and circles that’s often good enough. With irregular shapes, though, every part takes up its whole bounding rectangle.

By hand you can do better: rotate every other part, slot wing into wing, squeeze a few parts along the edge. Two bats turned 90° in the free strip on the right give you 14 instead of 12. Getting to 19 means fitting every part to its neighbors — that can easily take half an hour, and you start over whenever the size or the sheet changes.

MethodBats per sheetWhen it makes sense
Rows (grid array)12circles, rectangles, one-offs, quick batches
By hand, a few rotated at the edge14a handful of irregular parts when you have no nesting software
Automatic nesting19batches, irregular shapes, many different parts at once

On one sheet the difference is a few parts. On a batch it’s a few sheets — or a dozen.

Worked example: what scrap costs you in a month

Assumptions (an example): 1/8″ (3 mm) Baltic birch, a 600 × 400 mm sheet at $7.50 (laser-grade sheets this size run roughly $5–10 depending on grade and supplier), a 150 mm (5.9″) bat, 3 mm spacing, 5 mm margin. Rows fit 12, nesting fits 19.

OrderIn rowsNestedYou save
100 pcs9 sheets — $67.506 sheets — $45.003 sheets, $22.50
300 pcs25 sheets — $187.5016 sheets — $120.009 sheets, $67.50
1,000 pcs84 sheets — $630.0053 sheets — $397.5031 sheets, $232.50

Now picture a month in a shop that cuts about 1,000 parts like this. The material in the bats themselves is worth about $159. In rows you pay $630 for sheets, so about $470 goes to scrap; nested, about $240. Add 31 fewer sheet changes: at 2 minutes a sheet, that’s an hour of your time, or about $43 at a $42/h shop rate. Call it roughly $275 a month, over $3,000 a year — on one shape and the cheapest sheet stock. Cutting time itself doesn’t change: there’s the same length of line to cut. With acrylic or hardwood a sheet costs several times more, and so does the difference. How to build scrap into a job price is covered in our guide to laser cutting pricing.

Not every shape gains that much. Same sheet and settings, one shape at a time:

ShapeIn rowsNestedMore parts
Heart 70 × 63 mm (2.8 × 2.5″)40400%
Tree 56 × 72 mm (2.2 × 2.8″)5054+8%
Star 72 × 68.5 mm (2.8 × 2.7″)3540+14%
Bat 150 × 77 mm (5.9 × 3.0″)1219+58%

The more notches, tabs and wings a part has, the more nesting pays off. Circles, hearts and rectangles already pack well in rows — there, sensible spacing and staggering every other row by half a part do more.

Rotating and mirroring parts

You gain the most space by rotating parts so a bump on one slots into a notch on the next. In the bat layout, 10 of the 19 parts are rotated and 9 are mirrored. A mirrored part with no engraving is just the same part flipped over. But you need to rein that in in three cases:

Check whether your software lets you turn mirroring off, and look at the sheet preview before cutting — backwards text jumps out immediately.

Small parts inside holes and gaps

The center of a photo frame, the inside of a wreath or the letter O is material that normally drops into the tray. If the order includes small parts (tags, letters, tokens), put them right there — that’s part-in-part nesting. The same goes for gaps between large parts: there’s plenty of room between bat wings.

A 600 × 400 mm plywood sheet with 19 bats and 88 teal hearts placed in the gaps between them; next to it: 19 bats, plus 88 hearts, sheet utilization rising from 40 to 50 percent
The same sheet as above, filled with hearts about 2 cm (0.8″) across — a real Laser MTS nesting result.

Fillers make sense when you can sell or use them: a freebie in the package, gift tags, samples. The material is nearly free, laser time isn’t: the 88 hearts add almost 6 m (19 ft) of cut line, more than half of what the 19 bats take (about 11 m, 36 ft). With small parts, keep two more things in mind:

Part spacing: kerf and heat

Spacing in your software is measured between design lines — the centers of the cuts. The beam takes the kerf out of that, usually 0.1–0.3 mm (0.004–0.012″) depending on the laser, lens and material. At 0.5 mm (0.02″) spacing, what’s left between two cuts is a strip of wood thinner than half a millimeter.

Diagram of two neighboring cuts in plywood: at 0.5 mm spacing the strip of wood between them is charred and burned through in places, at 3 mm spacing the material between the cuts stays intact and heat only darkens the edge of the kerf
Schematic only: top view, heavily magnified, kerf drawn at 0.25 mm.

Kerf isn’t the whole story. A thin strip between two cuts has nowhere to shed heat: it darkens, warps, can burn through or catch fire, and both parts come out with darker edges — see how to prevent laser burn marks. A starting point:

The surest answer is a test on your own machine: cut pairs of rectangles at 1, 2 and 3 mm spacing (roughly 0.04, 0.08 and 0.12″) and see where the strip stays light-colored and stiff. Measure the kerf itself with a laser material test.

Grain direction

With plywood, the grain of the face veneer matters for two reasons:

In nesting terms, that means rotating only by 0° and 180° — the grain stays parallel. You usually fit fewer parts, so lock rotation only where grain really matters. MDF, hardboard and acrylic have no grain. Face veneers and grades are covered in best plywood for laser cutting.

Common-line cutting

Rectangular parts can be placed edge to edge, with no gap, so a single line cuts two parts at once. That’s common-line cutting.

Eight 60 × 40 mm rectangles: on the left each with its own outline and 3 mm spacing, 1600 mm of cutting on 249 × 83 mm of material; on the right butted together with shared lines, 1120 mm of cutting, 30 percent less, on 240 × 80 mm
Diagram: eight 60 × 40 mm (2.4 × 1.6″) tiles. Common lines shorten the cut by 30% (63″ down to 44″) and reduce the material needed by 7%.

The upsides are real: a shorter cut (1,120 instead of 1,600 mm in the example), less material and less heat in the sheet. So are the risks:

For press-fit joints and parts where every tenth of a millimeter counts, start with separate outlines.

Offcuts and remnants

Almost every job leaves a piece of sheet behind: a strip along the edge, a corner, a sheet full of holes. Toss it and it’s a loss. Stash it unlabeled and a month later nobody remembers whether it was 1/8″ or 3/16″. A simple system:

  1. Label it right away: material, thickness measured with calipers, date.
  2. Store it flat — a thin offcut leaning against the wall warps fast. Strips narrower than your smallest part plus two margins can go.
  3. Start new jobs with offcuts, especially small parts and test cuts.
  4. Price the remnant in. If an order leaves a quarter sheet you won’t use, charge for the whole sheet.

Offcuts have one catch: an irregular shape, which is exactly where laying parts out by hand takes longest. This is where automation makes the biggest difference. Laser MTS nesting lays parts out by their actual shape and rotates them, drops small filler parts from your library into the empty spaces, and lets you add an offcut from a photo — it finds the usable material on it, around holes from earlier jobs too, and places parts there before reaching for a new sheet. For many orders at once, automated order nesting spreads the whole job across as many sheets as it takes. You download the result as SVG, DXF or a LightBurn project (.lbrn2).

Frequently asked questions

What is nesting in laser cutting?

It’s arranging parts on a sheet so as many as possible fit while keeping the spacing and edge margin. Less scrap means fewer sheets for the same order and fewer sheet changes.

How much material does nesting save?

It depends on the shape. In the examples above: nothing for hearts, 8–14% more parts for trees and stars, and 58% more parts (37% fewer sheets) for bats.

How much space should I leave between parts when laser cutting?

For 1/8″ plywood and MDF, start at 2–3 mm (about 1/16–1/8″) and leave more for thicker stock. The kerf itself is only 0.1–0.3 mm, but a thin strip between cuts overheats and scorches.

Is common-line cutting worth it?

For batches of rectangular tiles, yes — the cut is shorter, by 30% in the example. For press-fit parts, small parts or curved edges, the risk usually outweighs the gain.